Manager Journal
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Manager Journal Manager Journal
    • Home
    • Archive
      • 2025
        • 2025, Vol. 41, Issue 1, May
        • 2025, Vol. 42, Issue 2, December
      • 2024
        • 2024, Vol. 39, Issue 1, May
        • 2024, Vol. 40, Issue 2, December
      • 2023
        • 2023, Vol. 37, Issue 1, May
        • 2023, Vol. 38, Issue 2, December
      • 2022
        • 2022, Vol. 35, Issue 1, May
        • 2022, Vol. 36, Issue 2, December
      • 2021
        • 2021, Vol. 33, Issue 1, May
        • 2021, Vol. 34, Issue 2, December
      • 2020
        • 2020, Vol. 31, Issue 1, May
        • 2020, Vol. 32, Issue 2, December
      • 2005-2019
        • 2019
          • 2019, Vol. 29, Issue 1, May
          • 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 2, December
        • 2018
          • 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 1, May
          • 2018, Vol. 28, Issue 2, December
        • 2017
          • 2017, Vol. 25, Issue 1, May
          • 2017, Vol. 26, Issue 2, December
        • 2016
          • 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 1, May
          • 2016, Vol. 24, Issue 2, December
        • 2015
          • 2015, Vol. 21, Issue 1, May
          • 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 2, December
        • 2014
          • 2014, Vol. 19, Issue 1, May
          • 2014, Vol. 20, Issue 2, December
    • Our Authors
    • Journal Information
      • Authors Guidelines
      • Open Acces
      • Indexing
      • Aims and scope
      • Editorial Board
      • Activity Report
    • Submit a manuscript
    Manager Journal
    Home»2016»Editorial Manager 24
    2016

    Editorial Manager 24

    Paul MarinescuBy Paul MarinescuApril 17, 2021Updated:October 15, 2021No Comments1 Min Read

     Page: 5

    From past to future

    When analysing the evolution of management, the past times can be seen as certitude, while the future ones can be discussed in terms of work hypotheses. Scenarios have the great virtue of providing unlimited possibilities to treat future realities. We can talk about virtual realities as forms of manifestation of future contexts. If, by the end of the 19th century, we were talking about Fayol’s theories, nowadays we have the possibility to analyse such theories from the perspective of their validation within the real economy. It is obvious that the critical analysis is at hand rather than the construction of a system architecture able to reveal, in terms of reflection and experiments (with successes and failures), the evolution of miscellaneous phenomena.

     

    Full text sources
    Paul Marinescu

    Related Posts

    A New Configuration: Management’s Paradigms – Acting in the Context of Social Economy

    April 18, 2021

    The Importance of Change Typology – a Key Element in the Enterprise’s Organizational Dynamics

    April 18, 2021

    The Agency Problem in the Romanian State Owned Enterprise: The “Contractual Paradox”

    April 18, 2021

    Organizational Management And Economic Development From A Fiscal Point Of View

    April 18, 2021
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Fiscal Challenges in Public Debt Management – a Romanian Perspective
    • Ethical Marketing In The Ai Era – A Strategic Necessity For Modern Companies
    • Review of Informality and Housing using Science Mapping Review Methodology: A Bibliometric Analysis.
    • Cultural effects over turnover intentions
    • Bank Digitalization And Challenges Of Implemented Central Bank Digital Currencies (Cbdcs)
    Recent Comments

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.