Manager Journal
    What's Hot

    Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership

    June 21, 2022

    Management Team Solutions at Crisis Caused by The Covid-19 Pandemic

    June 21, 2022

    Digital transformation and interventional models – McKinsey digital transformation frameworks vs. Center for Creative Leadership Direction – Alignment – Commitment approach. An initial review.

    June 21, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Manager Journal Manager Journal
    • Home
    • Archive
      • 2022
        • 2022, Vol. 35, Issue 1, May
        • 2022, Vol. 36, Issue 2, December
      • 2021
        • 2021, Vol. 33, Issue 1, May
        • 2021, Vol. 34, Issue 2, December
      • 2020
        • 2020, Vol. 31, Issue 1, May
        • 2020, Vol. 32, Issue 2, December
      • 2019
        • 2019, Vol. 29, Issue 1, May
        • 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 2, December
      • 2018
        • 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 1, May
        • 2018, Vol. 28, Issue 2, December
      • 2005-2017
        • 2017
          • 2017, Vol. 25, Issue 1, May
          • 2017, Vol. 26, Issue 2, December
        • 2016
          • 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 1, May
          • 2016, Vol. 24, Issue 2, December
        • 2015
          • 2015, Vol. 21, Issue 1, May
          • 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 2, December
        • 2014
          • 2014, Vol. 19, Issue 1, May
          • 2014, Vol. 20, Issue 2, December
    • Our Authors
    • Journal Information
      • Authors Guidelines
      • Open Acces
      • Indexing
      • Aims and scope
      • Editorial Board
      • Activity Report
    • Submit a manuscript
    Manager Journal
    Home»2016»The Agency Problem in the Romanian State Owned Enterprise: The “Contractual Paradox”
    2016

    The Agency Problem in the Romanian State Owned Enterprise: The “Contractual Paradox”

    Valentin IonescuBy Valentin IonescuApril 18, 2021Updated:October 15, 2021No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

     Pages: 106-115

    Introduction.The first is informal and the latter is formal. Both contracts are concluded between the same actors. The first transaction sets the rent extraction from the firm, while the second contract establishes the decision-making mechanism for the allocation of the firm’s resources. The “rent” is not treated in this study as a surplus, as in Ricardo-Marshall model, but as a profit.

    Aim of the study. This article is an analysis of a “contractual paradox” which exists in the relation between an agent and a principal, in the presence of rent extraction. This case focuses exclusively on the State Owned Enterprise – SOE in Romania. If the model built by MC Jensen and WH Meckling examines the agency costs occurring in the presence of an information asymmetry and conflicts of interest between the agent and the principal, “the contractual paradox” that I consider in this article assumes that the “agent” and the “principal” cooperate to extract a rent/profit detrimental to a State Owned Enterprise and, in this case, the conflict of interest between the two disappears or subsists only as regards rent extraction and risks sharing. The “contractual paradox” refers to the coexistence of two agency contracts in the same State Owned Enterprise.

    Keywords: corporate governance, agent – principal, agency costs, rent seeking, rent extraction 

    Full text sources
    agency costs agent – principal corporate governance rent extraction rent seeking
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Valentin Ionescu

    Related Posts

    Corporate Covernance As A Tool For Curbing Bank Distress In Nigeria Deposit Money Bank: Empirical Evidence

    May 10, 2021

    A New Configuration: Management’s Paradigms – Acting in the Context of Social Economy

    April 18, 2021

    The Importance of Change Typology – a Key Element in the Enterprise’s Organizational Dynamics

    April 18, 2021

    Organizational Management And Economic Development From A Fiscal Point Of View

    April 18, 2021
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership
    • Management Team Solutions at Crisis Caused by The Covid-19 Pandemic
    • Digital transformation and interventional models – McKinsey digital transformation frameworks vs. Center for Creative Leadership Direction – Alignment – Commitment approach. An initial review.
    • Digital leadership – a totally new approach or just another change management fad? A brief literature review
    • Editorial Manager 35
    Recent Comments
      Editors Picks
      Latest Posts

      Subscribe to Updates

      Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

      Advertisement
      Demo

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.