Manager Journal
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Manager Journal Manager Journal
    • Home
    • Archive
      • 2024
        • 2024, Vol. 39, Issue 1, May
        • 2024, Vol. 40, Issue 2, December
      • 2023
        • 2023, Vol. 37, Issue 1, May
        • 2023, Vol. 38, Issue 2, December
      • 2022
        • 2022, Vol. 35, Issue 1, May
        • 2022, Vol. 36, Issue 2, December
      • 2021
        • 2021, Vol. 33, Issue 1, May
        • 2021, Vol. 34, Issue 2, December
      • 2020
        • 2020, Vol. 31, Issue 1, May
        • 2020, Vol. 32, Issue 2, December
      • 2005-2019
        • 2019
          • 2019, Vol. 29, Issue 1, May
          • 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 2, December
        • 2018
          • 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 1, May
          • 2018, Vol. 28, Issue 2, December
        • 2017
          • 2017, Vol. 25, Issue 1, May
          • 2017, Vol. 26, Issue 2, December
        • 2016
          • 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 1, May
          • 2016, Vol. 24, Issue 2, December
        • 2015
          • 2015, Vol. 21, Issue 1, May
          • 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 2, December
        • 2014
          • 2014, Vol. 19, Issue 1, May
          • 2014, Vol. 20, Issue 2, December
    • Our Authors
    • Journal Information
      • Authors Guidelines
      • Open Acces
      • Indexing
      • Aims and scope
      • Editorial Board
      • Activity Report
    • Submit a manuscript
    Manager Journal
    Home»2016»Comparative Management – A Performance Vector
    2016

    Comparative Management – A Performance Vector

    Cătălin GrădinaruBy Cătălin GrădinaruApril 18, 2021Updated:October 15, 2021No Comments1 Min Read

     Pages: 88-98

    Introduction. Comparative management studies (parochial, ethnocentric, polycentric comparative, geocentric) allow us to define the scope of investigation starting from specific cultures, the similarities and differences between various cultures, from investigating multinational corporations, thus establishing the meaning of the evolution of management in the globalization era.

    Aim of the study. Through this analysis we intend to briefly present some of the common elements of management in each country and, at the same time, to point out some of the notable differences. Within our analysis, we consider some peculiarities of the specific management models of enterprises in the United States, Germany, Great Britain, France and Spain. In this regard, we shall use, inter alia, Geert Hofstede’s model regarding the cultural dimensions in management (individualism / collectivism, certainty / uncertainty, masculinity / femininity, high power distance / low power distance). 

    Keywords: management, result, effect, individual, global, managerial culture

    Full text sources
    effect global individual Management managerial culture result
    Cătălin Grădinaru

    Related Posts

    Operations Management And Leadership; A Case-Study Of Implementation of Centralized Back Office Activities

    May 10, 2021

    Leadership and Innovation – the Catalyst of IT &C Industry. A Case Study of BlackBerry Company

    May 10, 2021

    A Managerial Approach To A Controversial Exhibition: The Human Body

    May 5, 2021

    Leadership vs. Management From Competitive Intelligence Perspective

    April 28, 2021
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Radicalization Dynamics In Refugee Camps: Analyzing The Situation In Greece And Research Directions For Romania
    • Student collective action in support of Palestine: a case study at the University of Bucharest
    • Is The National Institute of Administration a model agency? The agencification process in Romania and a case study
    • Determinants of consumers’ intentions to purchase second-hand clothing in Romania
    • Determinants of materialism among the youth in Romania
    Recent Comments

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.