Manager Journal
    What's Hot

    Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership

    June 21, 2022

    Management Team Solutions at Crisis Caused by The Covid-19 Pandemic

    June 21, 2022

    Digital transformation and interventional models – McKinsey digital transformation frameworks vs. Center for Creative Leadership Direction – Alignment – Commitment approach. An initial review.

    June 21, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Manager Journal Manager Journal
    • Home
    • Archive
      • 2022
        • 2022, Vol. 35, Issue 1, May
        • 2022, Vol. 36, Issue 2, December
      • 2021
        • 2021, Vol. 33, Issue 1, May
        • 2021, Vol. 34, Issue 2, December
      • 2020
        • 2020, Vol. 31, Issue 1, May
        • 2020, Vol. 32, Issue 2, December
      • 2019
        • 2019, Vol. 29, Issue 1, May
        • 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 2, December
      • 2018
        • 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 1, May
        • 2018, Vol. 28, Issue 2, December
      • 2005-2017
        • 2017
          • 2017, Vol. 25, Issue 1, May
          • 2017, Vol. 26, Issue 2, December
        • 2016
          • 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 1, May
          • 2016, Vol. 24, Issue 2, December
        • 2015
          • 2015, Vol. 21, Issue 1, May
          • 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 2, December
        • 2014
          • 2014, Vol. 19, Issue 1, May
          • 2014, Vol. 20, Issue 2, December
    • Our Authors
    • Journal Information
      • Authors Guidelines
      • Open Acces
      • Indexing
      • Aims and scope
      • Editorial Board
      • Activity Report
    • Submit a manuscript
    Manager Journal
    Home»2014»Editorial Manager 19
    2014

    Editorial Manager 19

    Paul MarinescuBy Paul MarinescuApril 30, 2021Updated:November 1, 2021No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

     Page: 5

    The capital of relationships at the level of an organisation

    Leading high performance organisations is the attribute of those leaders capable of using, as motivating argument, the distribution of power at the level of the organisation members or, as attitudinal argument, the efficiency. In fact, it is about the positioning of the organisation manager in relation to people or to particular tasks. The individual power temptation can isolate the leader if this is inadequately distributed, being non-compliant with the people’s merits. We should consider the large range of power components, relating to: position, authority, expertise, resource owner, in general, information owner, in particular etc. In order to allow an equitable distribution of power, it is essential for the monitoring, control and assessment process to be impeccably achieved. We can refer to the double side of processes: quantitative and qualitative.

    Full text sources
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Paul Marinescu

    Related Posts

    New tools to monitor social networks in business sector

    April 30, 2021

    Feminine leadership and organisational culture

    April 30, 2021

    What should we learn from great leaders

    April 30, 2021

    The Power of Oratory in Modern Leadership

    April 30, 2021
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership
    • Management Team Solutions at Crisis Caused by The Covid-19 Pandemic
    • Digital transformation and interventional models – McKinsey digital transformation frameworks vs. Center for Creative Leadership Direction – Alignment – Commitment approach. An initial review.
    • Digital leadership – a totally new approach or just another change management fad? A brief literature review
    • Editorial Manager 35
    Recent Comments
      Editors Picks
      Latest Posts

      Subscribe to Updates

      Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

      Advertisement
      Demo

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.