Manager Journal
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Manager Journal Manager Journal
    • Home
    • Archive
      • 2024
        • 2024, Vol. 39, Issue 1, May
        • 2024, Vol. 40, Issue 2, December
      • 2023
        • 2023, Vol. 37, Issue 1, May
        • 2023, Vol. 38, Issue 2, December
      • 2022
        • 2022, Vol. 35, Issue 1, May
        • 2022, Vol. 36, Issue 2, December
      • 2021
        • 2021, Vol. 33, Issue 1, May
        • 2021, Vol. 34, Issue 2, December
      • 2020
        • 2020, Vol. 31, Issue 1, May
        • 2020, Vol. 32, Issue 2, December
      • 2005-2019
        • 2019
          • 2019, Vol. 29, Issue 1, May
          • 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 2, December
        • 2018
          • 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 1, May
          • 2018, Vol. 28, Issue 2, December
        • 2017
          • 2017, Vol. 25, Issue 1, May
          • 2017, Vol. 26, Issue 2, December
        • 2016
          • 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 1, May
          • 2016, Vol. 24, Issue 2, December
        • 2015
          • 2015, Vol. 21, Issue 1, May
          • 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 2, December
        • 2014
          • 2014, Vol. 19, Issue 1, May
          • 2014, Vol. 20, Issue 2, December
    • Our Authors
    • Journal Information
      • Authors Guidelines
      • Open Acces
      • Indexing
      • Aims and scope
      • Editorial Board
      • Activity Report
    • Submit a manuscript
    Manager Journal
    Home»2024»The Evolution of Multi-Pillar Pension Systems: Balancing Between Necessity, Opportunity and Complexity
    2024

    The Evolution of Multi-Pillar Pension Systems: Balancing Between Necessity, Opportunity and Complexity

    Dan ConstantinescuBy Dan ConstantinescuDecember 2, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read

     Pages: 7-21

    Introduction. The evolution of Romania’s pension system has followed a complex and often inconsistent legislative path, beginning with two unimplemented laws, and later progressing to the introduction of a multi-pillar system. Initially accompanied by optimism, the momentum behind pension reform soon faded, resulting in significant delays in implementing crucial regulations, such as the law on the guarantee fund. It was not until 2020 that substantial progress was made with the introduction of laws on occupational pension funds and the pan-European personal pension product (PEPP).

    Aim of the study. This paper aims to assess the impact of Romania’s evolving legislative framework, including secondary regulations, on the private pension market. Additionally, the paper examines the broader transformations and challenges facing the Romanian pension system, focusing on demographic shifts, socio-economic factors, and policy decisions that have shaped its current state. Key issues such as early retirement, the inclusion of low-contributory groups, and untaxed activities are analysed alongside the supply side of the market, including public, mandatory, and voluntary pensions, as well as occupational schemes. The implications of PEPP and strategies for financing the transition to a more sustainable system are also explored. By addressing these critical aspects, the paper provides a comprehensive analysis of Romania’s pension system and suggests actionable steps for improving its long-term sustainability and efficiency.

    Full text sources
    adjustment policies guarantee fund legislation and private pensions multi-pillar pension system pan-European personal pension product public policy social contributions
    Dan Constantinescu

    Related Posts

    Radicalization Dynamics In Refugee Camps: Analyzing The Situation In Greece And Research Directions For Romania

    December 20, 2024

    Student collective action in support of Palestine: a case study at the University of Bucharest

    December 20, 2024

    Is The National Institute of Administration a model agency? The agencification process in Romania and a case study

    December 20, 2024

    Determinants of consumers’ intentions to purchase second-hand clothing in Romania

    December 20, 2024
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Radicalization Dynamics In Refugee Camps: Analyzing The Situation In Greece And Research Directions For Romania
    • Student collective action in support of Palestine: a case study at the University of Bucharest
    • Is The National Institute of Administration a model agency? The agencification process in Romania and a case study
    • Determinants of consumers’ intentions to purchase second-hand clothing in Romania
    • Determinants of materialism among the youth in Romania
    Recent Comments

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.