Manager Journal
    What's Hot

    Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership

    June 21, 2022

    Management Team Solutions at Crisis Caused by The Covid-19 Pandemic

    June 21, 2022

    Digital transformation and interventional models – McKinsey digital transformation frameworks vs. Center for Creative Leadership Direction – Alignment – Commitment approach. An initial review.

    June 21, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Manager Journal Manager Journal
    • Home
    • Archive
      • 2022
        • 2022, Vol. 35, Issue 1, May
        • 2022, Vol. 36, Issue 2, December
      • 2021
        • 2021, Vol. 33, Issue 1, May
        • 2021, Vol. 34, Issue 2, December
      • 2020
        • 2020, Vol. 31, Issue 1, May
        • 2020, Vol. 32, Issue 2, December
      • 2019
        • 2019, Vol. 29, Issue 1, May
        • 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 2, December
      • 2018
        • 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 1, May
        • 2018, Vol. 28, Issue 2, December
      • 2005-2017
        • 2017
          • 2017, Vol. 25, Issue 1, May
          • 2017, Vol. 26, Issue 2, December
        • 2016
          • 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 1, May
          • 2016, Vol. 24, Issue 2, December
        • 2015
          • 2015, Vol. 21, Issue 1, May
          • 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 2, December
        • 2014
          • 2014, Vol. 19, Issue 1, May
          • 2014, Vol. 20, Issue 2, December
    • Our Authors
    • Journal Information
      • Authors Guidelines
      • Open Acces
      • Indexing
      • Aims and scope
      • Editorial Board
      • Activity Report
    • Submit a manuscript
    Manager Journal
    Home»2013»Conceptualizing in Special Sciences
    2013

    Conceptualizing in Special Sciences

    Bogdan BoghitoiBy Bogdan BoghitoiMay 10, 2021No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

     Pages: 120-130

    Introduction. One of the unfulfilled ideals of the modern mind is that of “unity of science”. It is, at the core, a reductive ideal. A key part part of its reductive approach consists, most often, in finding matches between the kinds one employs to theorize about certain processes and unique types of entities on a lower level in a mereological scale. This is widely assumed to provide reductions of the theory on the upper level to that on the lower one, and ultimately to the most basic, namely that of physics. Nevertheless this ideal, according to which every type of entity has to be shown to be ultimately equated with a definite type of microstructure, has been vehemently challenged.

    Aim of the study. The paper examines a few methods for drawing categories that can be employed in special sciences. By examining some of the core phenomena that laid the basis of the most prominent approaches to typing in special sciences, it shows that we must accept a novel approach to delineating scientific kinds. Its peculiarity is that makes the latter parts of an array of structures, rather than possessing a fixed one. This can provide with a useful principal line of approach the leaders attempting to organize complex and evolving phenomena.

    Keywords: concepts, special sciences, epistemology, evolution, functional, organization

    Full text sources
    concepts epistemology evolution functional organization special sciences
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Bogdan Boghitoi

    Related Posts

    ONLINE EDUCATION CHALLENGES IN THE NEW ERA OF GLOBALIZATION

    February 19, 2022

    Influencing average internet consumer’s online behavior. Fact. Fiction. Right. Wrong.

    May 10, 2021

    The economic impact of cloud computing technology on new business and employment in Romania

    May 10, 2021

    Potential Beneficiaries Of Cloud Accounting Technology: Small Or Large Companies?

    May 10, 2021
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Corporate Social Responsibility Leadership
    • Management Team Solutions at Crisis Caused by The Covid-19 Pandemic
    • Digital transformation and interventional models – McKinsey digital transformation frameworks vs. Center for Creative Leadership Direction – Alignment – Commitment approach. An initial review.
    • Digital leadership – a totally new approach or just another change management fad? A brief literature review
    • Editorial Manager 35
    Recent Comments
      Editors Picks
      Latest Posts

      Subscribe to Updates

      Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

      Advertisement
      Demo

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.