Manager Journal
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Manager Journal Manager Journal
    • Home
    • Archive
      • 2025
        • 2025, Vol. 41, Issue 1, May
        • 2025, Vol. 42, Issue 2, December
      • 2024
        • 2024, Vol. 39, Issue 1, May
        • 2024, Vol. 40, Issue 2, December
      • 2023
        • 2023, Vol. 37, Issue 1, May
        • 2023, Vol. 38, Issue 2, December
      • 2022
        • 2022, Vol. 35, Issue 1, May
        • 2022, Vol. 36, Issue 2, December
      • 2021
        • 2021, Vol. 33, Issue 1, May
        • 2021, Vol. 34, Issue 2, December
      • 2020
        • 2020, Vol. 31, Issue 1, May
        • 2020, Vol. 32, Issue 2, December
      • 2005-2019
        • 2019
          • 2019, Vol. 29, Issue 1, May
          • 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 2, December
        • 2018
          • 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 1, May
          • 2018, Vol. 28, Issue 2, December
        • 2017
          • 2017, Vol. 25, Issue 1, May
          • 2017, Vol. 26, Issue 2, December
        • 2016
          • 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 1, May
          • 2016, Vol. 24, Issue 2, December
        • 2015
          • 2015, Vol. 21, Issue 1, May
          • 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 2, December
        • 2014
          • 2014, Vol. 19, Issue 1, May
          • 2014, Vol. 20, Issue 2, December
    • Our Authors
    • Journal Information
      • Authors Guidelines
      • Open Acces
      • Indexing
      • Aims and scope
      • Editorial Board
      • Activity Report
    • Submit a manuscript
    Manager Journal
    Home»2015»Formal aspects of resilience
    2015

    Formal aspects of resilience

    Diana-Maria DrigăBy Diana-Maria DrigăApril 26, 2021Updated:November 1, 2021No Comments1 Min Read

     Pages: 322-328

    Introduction. The concept of resilience has represented during the recent years a leading concern both in Romania, within the European Union and worldwide. Specialists in economics, management, finance, legal sciences, political sciences, sociology, psychology, grant a particular interest to this concept. Multidisciplinary research of resilience has materialized throughout the time in multiple conceptualizations and theorizing, but without being a consensus between specialists in terms of content, specificity and scope.

    Aim of the study. This paper aims to highlight a few mThrough this paper it is intended to clarify the concept of resilience, achieving an exploration of the evolution of this concept in ecological, social and economic environment. At the same time, the paper presents aspects of feedback mechanisms and proposes a formalization of resilience using the logic and mathematical analysis.

    Keywords: resilience, systems, feedback, inverse connection, adaptive capacity, fragility, antifragilitaty, robustness
    JEL Classification: A10, O17, P00

    Full text sources
    adaptive capacity antifragilitaty feedback fragility inverse connection resilience robustness systems
    Diana-Maria Drigă

    Related Posts

    Navigating Uncertainty: Insights from Romanian Entrepreneurs on Opportunity Recognition, Resource Use, and Business Resilience during the COVID-19 Crisis

    August 19, 2025

    Key Aspects in Assessing Entrepreneurial Risks Before and After Implementing a Business Idea

    August 10, 2023

    Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Romania in the Dynamic Context of Recent Years

    August 10, 2023

    Synergy within a Scientific Research Centre

    April 30, 2021
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Navigating Uncertainty: Insights from Romanian Entrepreneurs on Opportunity Recognition, Resource Use, and Business Resilience during the COVID-19 Crisis
    • Telework and the Virtual Communication
    • Fiscal Challenges in Public Debt Management – a Romanian Perspective
    • Ethical Marketing In The Ai Era – A Strategic Necessity For Modern Companies
    • Review of Informality and Housing using Science Mapping Review Methodology: A Bibliometric Analysis.
    Recent Comments

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.